EHS teams don’t just need lower surface temperatures, they need a control that doesn’t degrade into non-compliance after maintenance, turnover, or repeated access.

Send drawings and operating conditions for review.

Built for environments where components are accessed, serviced, and put back into service—without losing coverage integrity.

Hot surfaces become a burn hazard fast. Skin can get a first-degree burn at temperatures above 140°F, which is why surface temperature matters in areas people can touch.

A turbine housing thermal survey documents a baseline condition (no cladding) and an HTI-insulated condition CMD1987. Both are shown at the peak condition (ER = 2.2, TiT = 760°C) with channel-based readings and orientation notes for traceability.

How to use this proof
It shows measured temperatures at defined points under stated operating conditions, useful for documentation and internal review. Shown for this test context; HTI reviews each application based on drawings and operating conditions.

We focus on documented risk reduction and repeatable implementation, so your control holds up in the real world—not just on install day.

• Controls break down when insulation or guards are removed for service and coverage isn’t restored the same way.
• What looked “safe” in one audit window becomes inconsistent after shift turnover, rework, or urgent maintenance.
• Documentation is often incomplete: no clear link between operating conditions, measured outcomes, and what must be maintained.

The goal isn’t a one-time fix, it’s a sustainable control you can defend over time.

Review drawings and operating conditions

We start with your layouts and how the system actually runs.

Identify critical hot zones and access points

Focus on where people work and where coverage is most likely to be disturbed.

Define coverage for repeatability through maintenance

The control has to survive service intervals, not just initial installation.

Support documentation and practical adoption

Provide the artifacts you need for internal review and ongoing execution.

If proof is missing for a specific configuration, we don’t guess, we document the approach and inputs needed.

To scope the right approach quickly, send drawings and operating conditions. If you don’t have everything, send what you have—photos and notes help.

1. Facility context and stakeholders
2. Audit drivers
3. Critical hot zones and exposure points
4. Maintenance workflow and accountability structure
5. Access frequency (how often removed for service)
6. Drawings (preferred); photos or specs optional
7. What problem are you trying to solve? Any known hot zones, failures, or prior insulation issues?

Send drawings and operating conditions for review.